Now is the time to review fire related building regulations

  •  

The tragic events of the Grenfell Tower fire have led to a nationwide debate around fire safety, especially concerning building materials, sprinklers and regulatory reform. One of the key questions which has emerged is why, after the Lakanal House fire in 2009, the government has not prioritised an update to building regulations. At the recent FIREX International event (pictured above), held at London's ExCel Centre, the Fire Sector Federation (FSF) hosted a panel to discuss the lessons learned and to debate why building regulations need to reviewed.

The panel expressed major concerns about the apparent disconnect in the processes which aim to ensure fire safety within the built environment, as well as concerns about the combustibility of certain modern building materials and techniques. Speaking at the event, Dennis Davis, FSF Vice Chair, summed up the feelings of many in the panel of UK fire safety experts: “We are on record as saying time and time again that we are desperately worried that our building regulations have been falling behind the scale and scope of what has been going on in the built environment.”

The construction environment has changed dramatically in the past 10 years and will continue to change.  It is imperative regulations are aligned with new developments, a thought echoed by Jim Glockling, Technical Director at the Fire Protection Association: “There is a failure of the regulations to respond to the changes in the built environment.  The way we are constructing buildings, the methods, the materials deployed to pursue the sustainability of the type we are seeing – these are completely unrecognisable compared to when the regulations were last approved.”

The panel also raised concerns around fragmentation within the construction industry, as panellist Niall Rowan, Chief Operations Officer at the Association for Specialist Fire Protection (ASFP) explained: “We are working with architect's to get fire protection into the RIBA plan of works. Part of this would include sign off by the responsible third party at each stage”. This move from the ASFP is a response to the weaknesses in a building's “chain of custody” when it comes to fire protection.

What was clear from the panel is that there has been a worrying complacency on the issue of fire protection, highlighted by the government's inaction towards updating guidance. The stable door legislative process which has relied on the influence of fatal fires, such as the one we have seen at Grenfell, needs to be reviewed.

We believe a wide ranging review of the building regulations relating to fire, particularly the guidance contained in Approved Document ‘B' (ADB) is overdue. It is needed to protect people and property from fire and to help business and building owners better understand the threat that fire poses to their infrastructure and future. This information is sorely needed as we now know from a recent YouGov survey that 69% of the businesses polled thought that following ADB guidance means that their business premises will be adequately protected from fire events. It doesn't, but it should.

The fire sector is calling for the government and the construction industry to work together in supporting a review of the current fire safety regulations, to include consideration of existing buildings. We are also appealing to both parties to take greater responsibility for the design and correct installation of fire protection systems across the built environment.

We have long campaigned for more robust solutions to be explored within the regulations which should protect life and property and we strongly believe that systems such as automatic sprinklers should be considered more readily as a viable option across the built environment, whether that it is existing high-rise residential blocks, care homes, or commercial and industrial buildings. Now is the time for our government to look at current regulations and recommendations with fresh eyes and provide a clear answer for tragedies such as Grenfell Tower, ensuring that we can prevent them in the future.

For more information about the Business Sprinkler Alliance visit www.business-sprinkler-alliance.org

Iain Cox, Chairman of the Business Sprinkler Alliance

Check out similar blogs on Talk.Build

https://talk.build/news/foundations-in-place-for-a-competence-led-built-environment

https://talk.build/blogs/looking-beyond-fire-safety

https://talk.build/blogs/fire-insulation-and-climate-change-the-challenges

https://talk.build/blogs/embracing-gender-diversity-in-construction

https://talk.build/blogs/building-safety-act-what-to-look-out-for

Additional Blogs

Is more protection needed for sub-contractors against main contractors?

Subcontractors continue to find themselves in precarious positions, especially when negotiating contracts with main contractors. A "take it or leave it" attitude, coupled with difficult contractual...

Read more

Will construction solve the crisis of suicides and mental health challenges?

The construction industry continues to deal with a silent epidemic - with a workforce, seemingly burdened by relentless demands, job insecurities and mental health struggles. It all adds up to a...

Read more

Western hypocrisy in construction standards - are we really better?

When tragedies like building collapses or fatal fires occur in developing nations, the criticism from Western observers is often swift and harsh. Western countries routinely accuse these nations of...

Read more

Submit your construction content here

Read more
Top
Login Logo